Brand Comparison
Fossil vs Casio
Quantify ownership structure, origin, and control signals in one view.
Derived from documented disclosures and scored consistently.
Foreign-owned profile
Fossil
India ownership score: 5/100
Foreign-owned profile
Casio
India ownership score: 5/100
Comparison Fit
These brands map as direct alternatives within Watches.
Profile match: segment:watches
Ownership Insight
Both brands map to a similar ownership orientation.
Score Breakdown
Equity ownership
Fossil: 0%
Casio: 0%
Manufacturing presence
Fossil: 20%
Casio: 20%
Revenue retention
Fossil: 30%
Casio: 30%
Strategic control
Fossil: 0%
Casio: 0%
Side-by-side Details
| Feature | Fossil | Casio |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | United States | Japan |
| Headquarters | Texas | Tokyo |
| Founded | 1984 | 1946 |
| Parent company | Fossil India | Casio India |
| Parent company country | United States | Japan |
| Manufacturing in India | 20% | 20% |
| Revenue retained in India | 30% | 30% |
| Ownership type | Foreign Company | Foreign Company |
| Strategic control | United States | Japan |
More comparisons in Watches
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Fossil Indian-owned?
Fossil is foreign-controlled.
Is Casio Indian-owned?
Casio is foreign-controlled.