Brand Comparison
Fossil vs Michael Kors
Quantify ownership structure, origin, and control signals in one view.
Derived from documented disclosures and scored consistently.
Foreign-owned profile
Fossil
India ownership score: 5/100
Foreign-owned profile
Michael Kors
India ownership score: 5/100
Comparison Fit
These brands map as direct alternatives within Accessories.
Profile match: segment:accessories
Ownership Insight
Both brands map to a similar ownership orientation.
Score Breakdown
Equity ownership
Fossil: 0%
Michael Kors: 0%
Manufacturing presence
Fossil: 20%
Michael Kors: 20%
Revenue retention
Fossil: 30%
Michael Kors: 30%
Strategic control
Fossil: 0%
Michael Kors: 0%
Side-by-side Details
| Feature | Fossil | Michael Kors |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | United States | United States |
| Headquarters | Texas | New York |
| Founded | 1984 | 1981 |
| Parent company | Fossil India | Michael Kors India |
| Parent company country | United States | United States |
| Manufacturing in India | 20% | 20% |
| Revenue retained in India | 30% | 30% |
| Ownership type | Foreign Company | Foreign Company |
| Strategic control | United States | United States |
More comparisons in Accessories
Foreign Competitors
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Fossil Indian-owned?
Fossil is foreign-controlled.
Is Michael Kors Indian-owned?
Michael Kors is foreign-controlled.